Different Treatment, Same Outcome: Reconciling Co-operative Compliance with the Principle of Legal Equality
Keywords:
Cooperative Compliance, Equality, Tax Compliance, Large Business TaxpayersAbstract
The paper discusses whether the concept of co-operative compliance is consistent in practice with legal equality and administrative fairness.
The theoretical framework of the discussion is provided by an analysis of the principle of legal equality. We base our analysis on a comparison of how the principle is enshrined in the constitutions of Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. In choosing these jurisdictions, we took into consideration the following criteria: legal tradition, the existence and maturity of their respective co-operative compliance programmes, and their personal scope.
Based on this analysis, we identify basic criteria for assessing the compatibility of these programmes with the principle of legal equality in the three selected jurisdictions. We determine that programmes limited to procedural treatment should not violate the principle of legal equality. As large business taxpayers are differentiated by the complexity of their tax affairs and are usually the biggest contributors to revenues, designing a special programme that fits their needs and helps them to be compliant is reasonable and justified in the light of general rules of tax procedure and the objective of the enforcement of tax liabilities and tax duties. Nonetheless, if programmes involve some economic advantages (e.g. a reduction of a tax liability), they may be seen to be disproportionate and inconsistent with the overall goals of good tax administration. As a result, they may not be consistent with the principle of equality.
References
Aristotle. (1925). Ethica Nicomachea (W.D. Ross, Trans.) London: Oxford University Press.
Baker, P. (2003). United Kingdom. In G. T. K. Meussen (Ed.), The Principle of Equality in European Taxation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Boston, US: Kluwer Law International.
Bammes, N. (2012). The Principle of Non-Discrimination in International and European Tax Law. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IBFD.
Barker, W. B. (2006-7). The Three Faces of Equality: Constitutional Requirements in Taxation. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 57(1), 1-53.
Barkhuysen, T., den Ouden, W., Schuurmans, Y. E. (2012). The Law on Administrative Procedures in the Netherlands. NALL : Netherlands Administrative Law Library, 2012(Juni).
Bogdanor, V (2003). The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century. New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Braccioni. P., Accili, B., Gioia, D., & Sacerdote, C. (2015a). SOX Sect. 404, Fin 48, OECD Papers: International Experience to Mark the Italian Way to Tax Co-operative Compliance and the New Role of Tax Advisors. Retrieved from https://www.paulhastings.com/docs/default-source/PDFs/stay-current-sox-sect--404-fin-48-oecd-papers-international-experience-to-mark-the-italian-way-to-tax-cooperative-compliance.pdf.
Braccioni. P., Accili, B., Gioia, D., & Sacerdote, C. (2015b). Tax Reform Update: International Experience to Mark Italian Way to Cooperative Compliance. Retrieved from http://www.paulhastings.com/publications-items/details/?id=9183e469-2334-6428-811c-ff00004cbded.
Brautigam, D. (1991). Governance and Economy: A Review (Working Paper No. WPS 815). Washington D.C., USA: World Bank.
Capaldi, N., & Lloyd, G. (2016). Liberty and Equality in Political Economy: From Locke versus Rousseau to the Present. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Chemerinsky, E. (1983). In Defense of Equality: A Reply to Professor Westen. Michigan Law Review, 81, 575-599.
Cleary Gottlieb (2015) The Italian Government Approves Tax Reform Legislation – Highlights. Retrieved January 2019, from https://www.clearygottlieb.com/-/media/organize-archive/cgsh/files/publication-pdfs/the-italian-government-approves-tax-reform-legislation-highlights.pdf.
Commission Horizontal Monitoring Tax and Customs Administration. (2012). Tax supervision – Made to Measure: Flexible when possible, strict where necessary. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Finance.
Cracea, A. (2013). OECD Actions to Counter Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance: Base Erosion and Profit Shifting and the Proposed Action Plan, Aggressive Tax Planning Based on After-Tax Hedging and Automatic Exchange of Information as the New Standard. European Taxation, 53(11).
Craig, P. (1997). Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: an Analytical Framework. In R. Bellamy (Ed.), The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (2005, pp. 95–115). Abingdon, UK/New York, USA: Ashgate Publishing.
de Blieck, L. A. (Ed.). (2004). Algemene wet inzake rijksbelastingen.
di Pietro, A. (1999). Italy. In G. T. K. Meussen (Ed.), The Principle of Equality in European Taxation (pp.115-124). Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Boston, USA: Kluwer Law International.
Dicey, A. (1952). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. (9th ed. ). London, UK: Macmillan and Co.
Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
Einaudi, M. (1948). The Constitution of the Italian Republic. American Political Science Review, 42(4), 661-676.
Englisch, J. (2014). Ability to Pay. In C. Brokelind (Ed.), Principles of Law: Function, Status and Impact in EU Tax Law (pp. 439-464). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IBFD.
Feldman, D. (2009). English Public Law: Oxford Principles of English Law (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Freedman, J. (2011). Responsive Regulation, Risk and Rules: Applying the Theory to Tax Practice. UBC Law Review, 44(3), 627-662.
Gassner, W., & Lang, M. (2000). Die mangelnde Leistungsfähigkeit des Leistungsfähigkeitsprinzips. ÖStZ, p. 643.
Gosepath, S. (2011). Equality. (E. N. Zalta, Ed.) (Spring 2011). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/equality.
Greggi, M. (2011). Revenue Authority Discretions and the Rule of Law: The Quest for a Recta Ratio. In C. Evans, J. Freedman, & R. E. Krever (Eds.), The Delicate Balance: Tax, Discretion and the Rule of Law. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IBFD.
Gribnau, H. (1999). General Introduction. In G. T. K. Meussen (Ed.), The Principle of Equality in European Taxation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Boston, USA: Kluwer Law International.
Gribnau, H. (2008). Soft Law and Taxation: EU and International Aspects. Legisprudence, 2(2), 67-117. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2445018.
Gribnau, H. (2013). Equality, Legal Certainty and Tax Legislation in the Netherlands. Fundamental Legal Principles as Checks on Legislative Power: A Case Study. Utrecht Law Review, 9(2), 52-74.
Gribnau, H. (2014). Not Argued From But Prayed To. Who’s Afraid Of Legal Principles? eJournal of Tax Research, 12(1), 185-217.
Gribnau, J. L. M. (2003). Equality, Consistency, and Impartiality in Tax Legislation. In J. L. M. Gribnau (Ed.), Legal Protection Against Discriminatory Tax Legislation: The Struggle for Equality in European Tax Law (pp. 7-32). The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law.
Gribnau, J. L. M. (2013). Legislative instrumentalism vs. legal principles in tax. Coventry Law Journal, (16), 89-109.
Gribnau, J. L. M. (2015). Cooperative compliance: some procedural tax law issues. In R. Russo (Ed.), Tax Assurance (pp.183-216). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gribnau, J. L. M., & Saddiki, J. (2003). Protection of European taxpayers by the principle of equality. In J. L. M. Gribnau (Ed.), Legal Protection Against Discriminatory Tax Legislation: The Struggle for Equality in European Tax Law (pp. 65-99). The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law.
Harrison, B. C. (2010). Power and Society: An Introduction to the Social Sciences. Boston, USA: Cengage Learning.
Hopkins, A. (2015). Equality before the law: the importance of understanding the experience of “others” in the criminal justice system (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/file/cab84a0e-89ce-4879-bc1d-535fdfc51af6/1/full_text.pdf.
Jennings, I. (1959). The law and the constitution (5th ed.). London: University of London Press.
Jowell, J. (1994). Is Equality a Constitutional Principle? Current Legal Problems , 47(Part 2), 1–18. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1093/clp/47.Part_2.1.
Jowell, J. L., Oliver, D., & O’Cinneide, C. (Eds.). (2000). The Changing Constitution. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, H. (2012). What is Justice? In H. Kelsen (Ed.), Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy (pp. 1-26). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
La Scala, A. E., & Tenore, M. (2010). Italy. In M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schuch, & C. Staringer (Eds.), Procedural Rules in Tax Law in the Context of European Union and Domestic Law. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Leigh Pemberton J., Majdanska, A. (2016). Changing the Relationship between Tax Administrations and Taxpayers. Tax Notes International, 81(3), 247-255.
Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government. Retrieved from http://pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/book1283.pdf.
Locke, J. (1980). The Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, USA: Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1690).
MacNaughton, G. (2009). Untangling equality and non-discrimination to promote the right to health care for all. Health and Human Rights, 11(2), 47-63.
Miguel, A. R. (1997). Equality before the Law and Precedent. Ratio Juris, 10(4), 372-391.
Nykeil, W., & Sek, M. (2010). Protection of Taxpayers’ Rights: European, international and domestic tax law perspective. Warsaw, Poland: Oficyna.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Study into the Role of Tax Intermediaries. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Co-operative Compliance: A Framework: From Enhanced Relationship to Co-operative Compliance. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264200852-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Co-operative Tax Compliance: Building Better Tax Control Frameworks. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264253384-en.
Owens, J. P. (2012). Tax Administrators, Taxpayers and Their Advisors: Can the Dynamics of the Relationship Be Changed? Bulletin for International Taxation, (9), 516-518.
Påhlsson, R. (2014). Equality in Taxation: Reflections on the Social Construction of Comparability in Tax Law. In C. Brokelind (Ed.), Principle of Law: Function, Status and Impact in EU Tax Law (pp.151-162). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IBFD.
Rabe, J. (2001). Equality, Affirmative Action and Justice (Doctoral thesis). Hamburg, Germany: Books on Demand.
Robson, W. A. (1928). Justice and administrative law: a study of the British constitution. London, UK: Macmillan and Co.
Rosenfeld, M. (1986). Substantive Equality and Equal Opportunity: A Jurisprudential Appraisal. California Law Review, 74(5), 1687-1712.
Rousseau, J-J. (1754). Second Discourse.
Russell, B. (1967). The History of Western Philosophy (4th ed.). New York, USA: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone. (Original published in 1945).
Ryan, M., & Foster, S. (2007). Unlocking constitutional and administrative law. London, UK: Hodder Arnold.
Sadurski, W. (2008). Equality and Legitimacy. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Salerno, G. M. (2011). Implementation and Revision of the Italian Constitution Since the 1990s. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(1–2), 114-122. http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.536094.
Soler Roch, M. T. (2012). Tax Administration versus Taxpayer – A New Deal? World Tax Journal, 4(3), 282–296.
Sousa Pinto, E. A. (n.d.). Ability to pay and indirect taxes: an economic analysis of the regression on Brazilian tax system. Retrieved from http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/chicago_-_ability_to_pay_-_pinto.pdf.
Syrett, K. (2011). The Foundations of Public Law: Principles and Problems of Power in the British Constitution. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Tobler, C. (2005). Indirect Discrimination: A Case Study Into the Development of the Legal Concept of Indirect Discrimination Under EC Law. Oxford, UK: Intersentia.
van den Nieuwenhuijzen, M. C. A. (Ed.). (2010). Financial Law in the Netherlands. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
van der Enden, E., & Bronzewska, K. (2014). The Concept of Cooperative Compliance. Bulletin for International Taxation, 68(10), 567-572.
van der Hel–van Dijk L., & Pheijffer, M. (2012). A Tailor-Made Approach to Fiscal Supervision: An Evaluation of Horizontal Monitoring. Bulletin for International Taxation, 66(10).
van der Hel–van Dijk, L., & Poolen, T. (2013). Horizontal Monitoring in the Netherlands: At the Crossroads. Bulletin for International Taxation, 67(12), 673-678.
van der Hel–van Dijk, L., & Siglé, M. (2015). Managing compliance risks of large businesses: A review of the underlying assumptions of co-operative compliance strategies. eJournal of Tax Research, 13(3), 760-783.
Vanistendael, F. (1996). Legal Framework for Taxation. In V. Thuronyi (Ed.), Tax Law Design and Drafting (Vol.1). Washington D.C., USA: International Monetary Fund.
Vukčević, I. (2014). (Lack of) understanding of the ability-to-pay principle in the Montenegro tax system - constitutional court case practice and legislative approach. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, 62(3).
Wesson, M. (2007). Equality and social rights: an exploration in light of the South African Constitution. Public Law, 2007, 748-769. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2264014.
Westen, P. (1982). The Empty Idea of Equality. Harvard Law Review, 95(3), 537-596. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1340593.
Zemach, A. (2011). Reconciling Universal Jurisdiction with Equality Before the Law. Texas International Law Journal, 47(1), 143-199.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Alicja Majdanska, Jonathan Leigh Pemberton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access status means that authors retain the copyright of their work. However, all papers published in JOTA are done so under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY). This means that others can share and/or adapt your work without your permission as long as they follow certain rules, including attributing your work correctly.
You can learn more about this on our Open Access, Licensing, and Copyright Policies page.
