Taxpayer Compliance Effects of Enhancing Taxpayer Rights - A Primer for Discussion of a Dedicated Research Agenda

Authors

  • John Bevacqua College of Arts, Social Sciences and Commerce, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

There is a welcome continuing Australian and global tax administration policy focus on ensuring adequate protection of taxpayer rights. This policy focus is, in part, driven by a presumption that enhancing taxpayer rights will lead to greater taxpayer voluntary tax compliance through the fostering of a climate of trust and confidence between taxpayers and tax officials.

However, the acceptance of a positive correlation between enhancement and awareness of taxpayer rights and willingness to comply implies a presumption that terms such as fairness (or trust) and taxpayer rights are synonymous. This paper questions this presumption, arguing that fairness and trust are much broader concepts which are difficult to conceive of as rights. Consequently, concepts such as fairness and trust are poor analogues for taxpayer rights.

Further, this paper argues that there is a dearth of clear empirical evidence to support any unimpeachable presumption of a correlation (positive or otherwise) between enhanced taxpayer rights and greater taxpayer willingness to comply, let alone evidence as to the strength of any such correlation if it, in fact, exists. The paper takes the argument further, pointing out that even if such a correlation can be shown to exist and its strength measured, there is a need for research which adds nuance to our understanding of any such correlation in order to provide useful guidance to policymakers considering making specific legislative changes to strengthen and/or clarify particular taxpayer rights. This paper makes the case for developing a dedicated research agenda capable of providing that guidance.

References

Air Canada v British Columbia, (1989) 59 DLR (4th) 161.

Bamforth, N. (1997). Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review. Cambridge Law Journal, 56(1), 1-4.

Beer, S., Kasper, M., Kirchler, E., & Erard, B. (2015). Audit Impact Study. In National Taxpayer Advocate, 2015 Annual Report to Congress – Volume II (pp. 68-99).

Beers, T., Wilson, J., Nestor, M., Ibbotson, A., Saldana, J., and LoPresti, E. (2013). Do Accuracy-Related Penalties Improve Future Compliance by Schedule C Filers? In National Taxpayer Advocate, 2013 Annual Report to Congress – Volume II (pp. 1- 14).

Bentley, D. (1996). Formulating a Taxpayers’ Charter of Rights: Setting the Ground Rules. Australian Tax Review, 25, 97-115.

Bentley, D. (2007). Taxpayers' Rights: Theory, Origin and Implementation. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Bevacqua, J. (2013). Redressing the Imbalance – Challenging the Effectiveness of the Australian Taxpayers’ Charter. Australian Tax Forum, 28, 377-400.

Bevacqua, J. (2015). A Chilling Account: North American and Australasian Approaches to Fears of Over-defensive Responses to Taxpayer Claims against Tax Officials. e-Journal of Tax Research, 13(1), 262-279.

Book, L. (2004). The Collection Due Process Rights: A Misstep or a Step in the Right Direction. Houston Law Review, 41(4), 1145-1206.

Braithwaite, V., & Braithwaite, J. (2001). Managing Taxation Compliance: The Evolution of the ATO Compliance Model. In M. Walpole. & C. Evans (Eds), Tax Administration in the 21st Century (pp.215-224). St. Leonards, NSW: Prospect Media.

Braithwaite, V. (Ed.) (2003). Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Brock, M. (2000). Restitution of Invalid Taxes - Principles and Policies. Deakin Law Review, 5(1), 127-155.

Caballé, J., & Panadés, J. (1997). Tax Evasion and Economic Growth. Public Finance, 52(3-4), 318-340).

Clayton, R. (2003). Legitimate Expectations, Policy and the Principle of Consistency. Cambridge Law Journal, 62(1), 93-105.

Commonwealth of Australia, Inspector-General of Taxation. (2014, April 10). New IGT Work Program.

Commonwealth of Australia, Inspector-General of Taxation. (2013, September). Annual Report 2012-13.

Commonwealth of Australia, Inspector-General of Taxation. (2015, November 2). Review into the Taxpayers’ Charter and Taxpayer Protections: Terms of Reference and Submission Guidelines.

Commonwealth of Australia, Inspector-General of Taxation. (2016, December). Review into the Taxpayers’ Charter and Taxpayer Protections.

Cowell, F. (1992). Tax Evasion and Inequity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 521-543.

Creyke, R., & McMillan, J. (2004). The Operation of Judicial Review in Australia. In M. Hertogh & S. Halliday (Eds). Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact - International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp.161-189). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (2014). Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Publication 5170 (7-2014) Catalog Number 66849X, Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5170.pdf

Devos, K. (2014). Factors Influencing Individual Taxpayer Compliance Behaviour. (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands).

Falkinger, J. (1995). Tax Evasion, Consumption of Public Goods and Fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 63-72.

Feld, L., & Frey, B. (2007). Tax Compliance as a Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation. Law and Policy, 29(1), 102-120.

Greenbaum, A. (1997). Taxpayers' Bills of Rights 1 and 2: A Charter to be Followed by the Rest of the World or Just Another Attack on the Tax Authority? Revenue Law Journal, 7(1), 138-163.

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

HM Revenue and Customs. (2013, October 2). Anti-Avoidance Strategy. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/avoidance/vision-strategy.htm.

James, S. & Wallschutzky, I. (1995). The Shape of Future Tax Administration. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation Bulletin, 49(5), 210-218.

Job, J., & Reinhart, M. (2003). Trusting the Tax Office: Does Putnam’s Thesis Relate to Tax? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 299-322.

Johnson, S. (2000). A Residual Damages Right Against the IRS: A Cure Worse Than the Disease. Tax Notes, 88, No. 395, 1-13.

Koys, D. (1991). Fairness, Legal Compliance and Organizational Commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 283-291.

Law Commission, United Kingdom. (2008). Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen. Consultation Paper No 187.

Mason, K. (1996). Money Claims By and Against the State. In P. Finn (Ed.), Essays on Law and Government - The Citizen and State in the Courts (Vol. 2, p116). Sydney: Law Book Company.

Mason, R., & Calvin, L. (1984). Public Confidence and Admitted Tax Evasion. National Tax Journal, 37(4), 489-496.

Murphy, K. (2003). Procedural Justice and Tax Compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 379-407.

Murphy, K. (2004). The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders. Law and Human Behaviour, 28(2), 187-209.

National Taxpayer Advocate. (2016a). 2016 Annual Report to Congress – Volume I.

National Taxpayer Advocate. (2016b). 2016 Annual Report to Congress – Volume III.

Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, Commonwealth of Australia. (1999). To Compensate or Not to Compensate? Own Motion Investigation of Commonwealth Arrangements for Providing Financial Redress for Maladministration.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration. (2001). Principles of Good Tax Administration. (Practice Note GAP001).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Economics Department. (2008). Tax and Economic Growth – Summary and Main Findings (Working Paper No. 620).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Tax Administration in OECD and Selected Non-OECD Countries – Comparative Information Series.

Owens, J., Olson, N., & Baker, P. (2016). Conversations: Jeffrey Owens, Nina Olson, and Philip Baker. Tax Notes International, 81(7), 595-600.

Pannam, C. (1964). The Recovery of Unconstitutional Taxes in Australia and in the United States. Texas Law Review, 42(6), 777-803.

Pape v Commissioner of Taxation, [2009] HCA 23

R. v Inland Revenue Commissioners Ex p. MFK Underwriting Agencies Ltd (MFK Underwriting) [1990] WLR 1545, 1569-1570; [1989] STC 873, 892-893.

Reynolds, O. (1968). The Discretionary Function Exception of the Federal Torts Claims Act. Georgetown Law Journal, 57, 81-133.

Roberts, M., & Hite, P. (1994). Progressive Taxation, Fairness and Compliance. Law and Policy, 16(1), 27-48.

Roth, J., Scholz, J., & Witte, A. (Eds.). (1989). Taxpayer Compliance, Vol 1: An Agenda for Research. Pennsylvania, US: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Sales, P., & Steyn, K. (2004). Legitimate Expectations in English Public Law: An Analysis. Public Law, 2004, 564-592.

Sheffrin, S. & Triest, R. (1992). Can Brute Deterrence Backfire? Perceptions and Attitudes in Tax Compliance. In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Who Pays Taxes and Why? Tax Compliance and Enforcement (pp. 193-218). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Scholz, J. (1998). Trust, Taxes and Compliance. In V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and Governance (pp. 135-166). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Scholz, J., & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398-417.

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan, W. & Cadell, T.

Stewart, C. (2000). Substantive Unfairness: A New Species of Abuse of Power? Federal Law Review, 28(3), 617-635.

Tanzi, V. & Shome, P. (1994). A Primer on Tax Evasion. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation Bulletin, 48(6-7), 328-337.

Torgler, B. (2002). Tax Morale and Tax Compliance in Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657-683.

Torgler, B., Demir, I., Macintyre, A., & Schaffner, M. (2008). Causes and Consequences of Tax Morale: An Empirical Investigation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(2), 313-339.

Tyler, T. (2000). Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 117-125.

Uslaner, E. (2007). Tax Evasion, Trust, and the Strong Arm of the Law. In N. Hayoz & S. Hug (Eds.), Tax Evasion, Trust and State Capacities (pp. 17-50). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang AG.

Vestey v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1977] STC 414, 439 per Walton J.

Victoria v Commonwealth and Hayden (1975) 134 CLR 338

Wells, B. (1994). Restitution from the Crown: Private Rights and the Public Interest. Adelaide Law Review, 16(1), 191-213.

Wenzel, M. (2002). The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers’ Identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 629-645.

Wickerson, J. (1994). Measuring Taxpayer Compliance: Issues and Challenges Facing Tax Administrations. Australian Tax Forum, 11(1), 1-44.

Worsham, R. G. Jr. (1996). The Effect of Tax Authority Behavior on Taxpayer Compliance: A Procedural Justice Approach. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(2), 19-39.

Volume 4.2 of JOTA - Bevacqua

Downloads

Published

29-11-2018

How to Cite

Bevacqua, J. (2018). Taxpayer Compliance Effects of Enhancing Taxpayer Rights - A Primer for Discussion of a Dedicated Research Agenda. Journal of Tax Administration, 4(2), 6–24. Retrieved from https://journals.docuracy.co.uk/jota/article/view/82